Defendant

A Imprisonment of 2 years and 6 months, Defendant B’s imprisonment of 6 months, Defendant C’s imprisonment of 8 months, Defendant J. and Defendant J.

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant A is a person who carries on cultural heritage repair business;

Defendant

A knew that a subsidized business operator who meets the requirements for restoration, repair, etc. of cultural heritage bears a certain ratio of self-payment, and that the total amount of the remaining construction cost would be subsidized by national expenses, local expenses, etc., and that it would be paid by subsidized business operators, such as the inspection, etc. allocated the subsidy budget for the repair work of cultural heritage from Seocho-si, by applying for the repair work of cultural heritage by pretending that Defendant A was granted a subsidy, and by applying for the repair work of cultural heritage. A

P-related crimes (1) The Defendant A acquired subsidies from the Q-related Maintenance Corporation (LA) around June 201, in the amount of 260 on the racing and viewing cultural properties in the amount of 260 on the racing city, and Q-related Maintenance Corporation (LA) around Q-related business costs of KRW 85,619,000,000, as a result of changes in total business costs of KRW 496,000,000,000,000.

The government submitted a letter of self-payment under the name of the P widely known person to the effect that the P bears the remaining project cost of KRW 410 million and the P bears the self-payment of the subsidy.

However, the fact was that Defendant A, who was in charge of the construction of the above P Debentures Reconstruction Corporation, voluntarily deposited the amount equivalent to the self-paid share in the name of P, into the K account in the name of the corporation.

After all, Defendant A, as seen above, was issued KRW 410 million from the time of the victim racing to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (R) in the name of P on June 27, 201 (2.5 million won in the national expenses, KRW 61.5 million in the Do, KRW 1.5 million in the city expenses, KRW 143.5 million in the city expenses).

As a result, Defendant A received a total of KRW 410 million from the victim racing city as a construction subsidy, and acquired it by fraud, and made a false application or fraudulent act.