logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.14 2016나58033
손해배상
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

[Claim]

Reasons

1. The Defendant filed a lawsuit against C, who is an employee of the Plaintiff, seeking the payment of a loan (hereinafter “related case”) with the Seoul Western District Court Decision 201Da154033, and the Plaintiff appeared as a witness on April 10, 2013 in the foregoing case and testified.

On May 20, 2013, the defendant filed a complaint against the plaintiff under suspicion of perjury with respect to the plaintiff's testimony, and around May 28, 2013, the Eunpyeong Police Station made the complainant's statement.

On June 5, 2013, the Plaintiff appeared at the court of Seoul Western District Court 410, where the date for pleading of the relevant case is proceeding. On July 9, 2013, the Defendant filed a complaint against the Plaintiff on the charge of defamation against the Defendant’s speech at the above court.

As a result, the defendant, at around 11:50 on June 5, 2013, the facts in the Seoul Western District Court 410 on the Mapo-gu Seoul Western District Court 174 (No. 50 on June 5, 2013, the defendant was convicted of the defendant's appeal by the Seoul Western District Court 100,000 won and the defendant's appeal was dismissed on the ground that "the defendant was convicted of a fine of 100,000 won and the defendant was sentenced to a fine of 214,214, and the defendant was convicted of the defendant's appeal on the criminal facts that "the defendant had no fact that the victim's police did not escape, despite the fact that the victim Gap did not escape from the police."

[Reasons for Recognition] Evidence No. 1, Evidence No. 5, Evidence No. 5, Witness C's testimony, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The defendant's assertion 1 of the parties concerned is the defendant.

arrow