logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.04.30 2015고단795
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 3,00,000 won, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 2,50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 17:40 on January 17, 2015, Defendant A expressed that, in front of the building of the Seoul Southern-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Defendant A was able to receive the 112 report, Defendant A was able to find a horse H and I belonging to the G District District of the Incheon Southern-dong Police Station G District, Incheon, which intended to receive and send the 112 report, and expressed to the above I, who was on the front of the patrol, who was on the front of the patrol, saying, “I would have no money? I would like to see, I would like to see, “I would have no money? I would have so you will now go off, I would have to go back, I would have to go back at the front of the patrol.”

Accordingly, the Defendant: (a) intending to stop the patrol vehicle of H and I expressed his desire to “I would like to see why it would be why the people are frighted; (b) it is a civil petitioner; (c) when she puts the body to fright, and takes the fright of the said I’s entry into his hand; (d) she took the fright of the said I’s entrance into his hand; and (e) she took the h’s bath, she took the fright of the said H, and she took the fright of the fright of the said H, and obstructed the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the report case by assaulting the police officer, such as provokinging the fright of the fright and cutting the bridge beyond the floor.

2. Defendant B and the Defendants reported the appearance that A is arrested as a flagrant offender of the obstruction of performance of official duties at the time, time, and place mentioned in the above paragraph (1), together with the appearance that A is arrested as a flagrant offender of the obstruction of performance of official duties, and Defendant B committed assault, such as h and I’s flab, and the Defendants committed assault, such as flabing I’s arms and body together, thereby interfering with the legitimate performance of official duties regarding the arrest of a flagrant offender by the police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to H and I;

1. Written statements of J, K and L;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing victim H photographs;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

(a) Defendant A: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act

B. Defendant B and C: Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Code

1. Each of the provisions of Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Code of Trade and Trade.

arrow