1. The Defendant’s KRW 1,029,397 as well as 5% per annum from January 19, 2018 to June 14, 2018 to the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

(a) Outline of the rearrangement project - Business name: B housing redevelopment improvement project (hereinafter referred to as “instant project”): Location and size: approximately 153,501 square meters in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C (hereinafter referred to as “instant rearrangement zone”): The public inspection and announcement as to the improvement plan - The defendant - the project implementer: the public inspection and announcement as to the improvement plan on June 14, 2007, the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government public announcement of the renewal acceleration plan for D E urban renewal acceleration district - the public announcement of the public announcement of the approval of the renewal acceleration plan on June 20, 2013:

B. On November 10, 2007, the Plaintiff leased the “Seoul Seongbuk-gu H Road Name Address” located within the instant improvement zone from Nonparty G to “Seoul Seongbuk-gu J.” (hereinafter “Seoul Seongbuk-gu Housing Name”). I [the 20,000,000,000 deposit money and the period from December 3, 2007 to December 2, 2009] (hereinafter “instant housing”).

2) On January 7, 2008, the Plaintiff made a move-in report to the Seongbuk-gu Seoul H on January 3, 2008. 3) According to the Plaintiff’s resident registration copy issued on October 30, 2017, Nonparty K, L, and M, who are the Plaintiff’s children, had a resident registration address in Seongbuk-gu Seoul H as of the date of the said issuance.

4) After filing a move-in report on January 7, 2008, the Plaintiff did not have any record of moving his/her domicile from Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H to another place until October 30, 2017, which is the date of issuance of a certified copy of the said resident registration. [Grounds for recognition] The Plaintiff did not have any dispute over the fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 4 (including the provisional number; hereinafter the same shall apply

(2) Each entry of the evidence of Nos. 1 to 4 and the purport of the whole pleading

2. The assertion and judgment

A. On November 10, 2007, the Plaintiff’s assertion leased the instant housing located within the instant rearrangement zone. On January 7, 2008, the Plaintiff filed a move-in report and continued to reside in the instant rearrangement zone together with Nonparty K, L, and M, who is the Plaintiff’s children. However, since the Plaintiff moved out of the instant rearrangement zone due to the implementation of the instant project, the Defendant was the Plaintiff’s relocation cost.