logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.07.05 2017구단77889
주거이전비
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 8,742,596 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from December 2, 2017 to July 5, 2018.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

(a) Outline of the rearrangement project - Project name: B district redevelopment and rearrangement project (hereinafter referred to as the "project in this case"): Location and size: approximately 87,025m2m2 (hereinafter referred to as the "improvement zone in this case"): Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government - Public inspection and announcement as to the improvement plan - Defendant - Public announcement as to the improvement plan: public announcement as to May 26, 2008, the Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government public announcement as to the alteration of D E district and the alteration of urban renewal acceleration plan (draft): Public announcement as to May 26, 2008 - Public announcement as to May 31, 2010

B. The Plaintiff’s residential situation 1) On April 20, 2007, the details of the building on the registry of the building above the building above the building located in the building above the building above the building above the building above the building above the building above the building in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu H ground located within the instant improvement zone from Nonparty G, the Plaintiff’s father, on April 20, 207, are “49.86 square meters per each floor of the second floor, 2 stories, 49.86 square meters per 6.25 square meters per rooftop, 6.86 square meters per 49.86 square meters per 1st floor (hereinafter “instant housing”).”

(2) On August 17, 198, the Plaintiff leased 3,000,000 deposit money, KRW 300,000 per month, and the lease term from May 3, 2007 to May 2, 2009. (2) The Plaintiff leased 3,00,000 to Nonparty G’s children (households) in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, and was a minor at the time of the said transfer.

The first moving-in report was made, and on May 31, 2007, it became an independent householder by making a new moving-in report due to the household cost at the same domicile as above.

3) On May 31, 2007, Nonparty I, the spouse of the Plaintiff, made a move-in report to “Seoul Yangcheon-gu Seoul Ha” on May 31, 2007. 4) The Plaintiff and Nonparty I continued to have their domicile in “Seoul Yangcheon-gu Seoul Ha” until they make a new move-in report on August 30, 201.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 8, Eul evidence No. 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1 is that the plaintiff, who is his spouse, made a public announcement of the improvement plan of this case with the non-party I.

arrow