logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 01. 12. 선고 2016두54527 판결
특별한 입증자료 없이 상속인 명의의 대출 채무를 상속채무로 공제할 수 없음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2016-Nu-3836 (2016.08)

Case Number of the previous trial

Early High Court Decision 2014-China-031 ( October 16, 2015)

Title

No debt borrowed under the name of the heir shall be deducted as an inherited debt without any special supporting material.

Summary

Since a debtor of a loan is a claimant, barring any special circumstance, the loan shall not be deducted as an inheritance liability, such as where the debtor is a debtor of the loan, and where the debtor fails to produce clear evidence that the predecessor is the debtor's obligation to bear

Related statutes

Public imposts, etc. deducted from the value of inherited property under Article 14 of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act;

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2016Du54527 Decided revocation of Disposition of Reduction or Correction of Inheritance Tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

CHAPTER 00

Defendant-Appellee

00. Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2016Nu38336 Decided 2016.08

Imposition of Judgment

2017.012

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Examining the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal, the ground of appeal by appellant is examined.

Since it is obvious that the appeal is groundless as it falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Buildings, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of

arrow