1. As to the appeal against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and the Defendant’s counterclaim against the instant principal lawsuit and the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

1. The grounds for appeal by the Defendants cited in the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the facts established and the judgment of the court of first instance are justified even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance is added to the evidence submitted in this court.

Therefore, the judgment of this court is based on the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance.

The “teglass” in the first place of Paragraph 1 is called “teglass”, and Article 2-A.

1. The grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: “The above father” under the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act is deemed to be “the above site”; and “9,254,000 won” under the second sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed to be “9,258,064 won” under the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate. Thus, all appeals filed by the Defendants against the principal lawsuit of this case and appeals against the counterclaim by the Defendant company are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.