A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months and by a fine not exceeding three hundred thousand won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, it shall be gold.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person who is engaged in driving service with a 125cc c letomeral wheels.

On December 12, 2019, the Defendant, without obtaining a motorcycle driver's license on December 17:50 on December 17, 2019, driven the above Otoba, leading the crosswalk front of the C Council member located in Seo-gu Busan, to the bathing beach at an indefinite speed from the side of the D market.

The location has a crosswalk where signal lights are installed on the front door, so in such a case, the driver of the Otoba has a duty of care to protect pedestrians and prevent accidents by safely operating the front door and the left door well and the right and the right by safely complying with the signal.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went to the port from the right side of the road along the pedestrian signal, when he negligent in driving the crosswalk in contravention of the signal while driving the signal, and received the front part of the road that the Defendant drives the victim E (the 72 years old) who walked to the right side of the road along the pedestrian signal.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the closure of a frame that requires approximately eight weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) driving a 125cc letode diade without obtaining a motorcycle driver’s license at the same time and place as stated in paragraph 1.

3. The owner of a motor vehicle violating the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall not operate a motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance, and the defendant is a holder of 125cc letomeral diapers who is not covered by mandatory insurance.

Nevertheless, the defendant operated the above Oral Ba which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the same time and place as that mentioned in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E;