logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.07.06 2015노4740
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact, the instant E (hereinafter “the instant marina business”) was unaware of the fact that it was a place where sexual traffic was conducted.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing (an amount of KRW 3 million) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court’s judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts and the evidence duly admitted and investigated by this court, the Defendant was sufficiently aware of the fact that sexual traffic was conducted at the instant marina business establishment.

The decision is judged.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below is justified, and the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

1) The owner of the instant marina business at the investigative agency (“A”) shall divide the amount of KRW 130,000,000,000, and KRW 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

Since they want, they are aware that they will engage in sexual traffic, i.e., sexual traffic.

"(Evidence No. 142 pages of evidence)" is specifically stated on the amount of sexual traffic, the circumstances in which kis can become aware of sexual traffic.

2) A person who served as the head of the Si/Gun.

C The investigative agency is aware of the fact that a person engaged in sexual traffic is engaged in sexual traffic at the instant marina business establishment.

“(Evidence No. 98 pages of the Evidence)” and “persons who engage in entertainment are aware that they are sexual traffic, i.e., sexual traffic, and 100,000 won below 70,000 won if the amount exceeds 100,000 won.”

“(140 pages of the evidence record)” is consistent with the above A’s statement.

3) The defendant's act of guests G, who had been entering the instant marina business place, was 1.30,000 won from the defendant (on the fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor).

The defendant is present as a witness at the court of the first instance (Evidence No. 10, 11, 26 pages) and C, and the Morse branch of this case is engaged in sexual traffic.

arrow