1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by each person;

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) is an insurer who has concluded each comprehensive motor vehicle insurance contract with respect to the ERati Motor Vehicles owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and F Co., Ltd. with respect to G 25 tons dump trucks owned by Defendant D (hereinafter “Defendant”)

Defendant C is a police officer belonging to the Republic of Korea who investigated the instant accident.

B. On December 18, 2013, at around 10:25, the Plaintiff: (a) the five-lane road of the Gangseo-gu, Seoul Mapo-gu, Seoul, along the two-lane roads, located in the Dongwon-dong; (b) the two-lanes of the two-lanes, the Defendant D driven in the same direction depending on the two-lanes; and (c) the two-lanes of the two-lanes following the left side of the Defendant vehicle and the left side of the Plaintiff vehicle.

Plaintiff

The above collision led to the vehicle's body moving back to the front side of the Defendant vehicle in two-lanes of the two-lanes of the vehicle, and the Defendant vehicle reconfiscing to the left side of the Plaintiff vehicle, and collisions with the upper side of the H vehicle in which the right side of the Plaintiff vehicle is driving on one lane (hereinafter referred to as "non-party vehicle"), and the Defendant vehicle reconfiscing to the upper side of the Plaintiff vehicle with the upper side of the back side of the vehicle, and reconfiscing to the left part of the vehicle with the upper part of the back side of the Plaintiff vehicle, and shocking to the upper part of the left part of the vehicle.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

After the accident of this case, the Plaintiff received the accident report to Defendant B.

On the other hand, around December 24, 2013, the Plaintiff inquired the traffic department of the Mapo Police Station and confirmed that the instant accident was not received, and prepared an accident inspection report around December 28 of the same year (the Plaintiff did not change the vehicle, and rather, caused the accident due to the drilling of Defendant vehicle) and submitted it to the Mapo Police Station for an investigation of the accident.

Defendant C, a police officer belonging to the Mapo Police Station, shall investigate the instant accident.