logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.12.01 2016누62537
의상자불인정처분취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

The reasons why the court should explain this case are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as set forth below 2. Thus, this case shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. In addition, the part which is dismissed or added, the "J" of the judgment of the court of first instance, which reduces 16th, of the judgment of the court of first instance, is referred to as "C".

In addition, the following shall be added to the end of 7th decision of the first instance court.

If the plaintiff's act can be seen as an act of seeking the victims' property from an imminent danger, even if there was a private interest or motive to obtain a contribution from the arrest of the criminal, such circumstance alone is difficult to deem that the plaintiff's act does not constitute salvage. Thus, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow