(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.04.03 2014나25575

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.04.03 2014나25575

손해배상 등

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's lawsuit on the selective claims added in the trial shall be dismissed.

3...

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except where part of the judgment of the first instance is re-written or a new argument is added in the trial as stated in the following 2. Therefore, it is consistent with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2.In addition, a part to be re-written or added "I 30 No. 30" shall be added to the following 16th 14th 16th of the judgment of the first instance.

There shall be no "not" from the 15th "point, etc. of the judgment of the court of first instance to the 4th "one" of the same side, as follows:

In light of the fact that the Plaintiff’s instruction on the preparation of the Plaintiff’s entrance franchising statement includes the following: “Slanders, insults, lack, and franchising that are published in various places, such as the Internet camera, etc., will not be trusted,” and ④ The part of the report of this case that the Plaintiff’s franchising from external information in the report of this case appears to be aimed at educating the Plaintiff not only at controlling all the personal life of the Plaintiff but also at preventing the Plaintiff from accessing all kinds of information criticizeing the Plaintiff, it is insufficient to recognize that the contents of the report of this case 5 are false, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.” In light of the fact that the testimony of the witness AF of the first instance court does not constitute “1-6 evidence 26 evidence” in the 15th nineth sentence of the first instance judgment of this case.

The following shall be added to “A” and “A” and “A” in the 15th 14th sentence of the first instance court:

iii)in the letter drawn up by the N directly, the statement stating that the proprietor who promised to be the principal at the time of the fulfillment of the succession of the picture is the principal” and the statement stating that “15th 16th 16th 15th 16th of the first instance judgment” is added:

On the other hand, the expression "reforesting" is an opinion that the defendant, a religious broadcasting station, evaluates the plaintiff's doctrine from his own perspective.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2015.09.11 2014나58803

-서울고등법원 2015.09.18 2014나2048390

-서울고등법원 2015.04.10 2014나2021777

-서울고등법원 2015.12.30 2015나2032521

-서울고등법원 2016.01.29 2015나20690