1. The judgment of the first instance, including the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff)’s counterclaim extended by this court, is as follows.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff as a party is jointly operated with I in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government with the trade name of “D Council member,” and the Defendant (J students and women) is a person who was operated by the Plaintiff at the Plaintiff’s hospital and received a pair of surgery from the Plaintiff.

B. On April 27, 2015, the Defendant left the Plaintiff hospital and consulted the Plaintiff with respect to the eye and crypology operation. On April 27, 2015, the Defendant performed the two gypopic surgery in the form of the Burial Act (hereinafter “instant surgery”).

(2) On April 28, 2015, the following day of the instant surgery, the Defendant sent to the Plaintiff hospital the appearance where the operation on the coconcept part was too T, and he was aware, and there was no inconvenience in connection with the instant operation.

C. On May 10, 2015, the Defendant sent a text message to the Plaintiff Hospital to the effect that on May 10, 2015, the Defendant: (a) sent to the Plaintiff Hospital a Kakakakakao Stockholm. The left eye of the instant surgery is too visible to the head of the Kakao Kakao Pacific. The first time, where the part of the surgery was known to open, the snow alle alle allebane allebhs. The left al part of the surgery fell considerably after the surgery. As can be seen, the Defendant sent a text message to the effect that the front eye of the instant surgery falls short of one day.”

On the following day, the defendant was admitted to the plaintiff hospital and received the medical examination by clarifying the above symptoms, and the plaintiff found the above conditions in the left eye or the stude of the defendant's snow or the stale, and discovered the stale.

The plaintiff prepared on the same day in the medical record "at the time of the special damage X. snow leakage in the operation part"

Y. The statement was written as “HHEX.”

On May 29, 2015, the Plaintiff explained to the Defendant that “the situation in which the Defendant is screened” is “the situation in which the Defendant is screened.”

2 The defendant shall be on May 19, 2015 and on May 22, 2015.