The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant: (a) sold the telecom building with the market price of KRW 3.3 billion in Silung-si to E; (b) had the registration of ownership transfer under his name; and (c) claimed that the above registration of ownership transfer is null and void in relation to the debt succession amount remaining in the above building; and (d) had the intent to file a complaint with a certified judicial scrivener F who vicariously performed the registration of ownership transfer in order to nullify the sales contract itself of the instant building or to have superior advantage

On March 2013, the defendant prepared a complaint upon request of G, G, and affixed a seal to the above complaint in Si interesting City D.

The criminal complaint stating that "the F requested the E to make an additional payment of the purchase price, but the F applied for the registration of ownership transfer without the consent of the defendant," and the fact that the defendant, E, and F consented to the registration of ownership transfer and paid the balance of the purchase price in full on February 18, 2013, which is the day immediately before the registration of ownership transfer is made, and the defendant affixed a seal on the registration of ownership transfer and affixed a seal on the registration of ownership transfer on the same day, and the additional payment of the purchase price was made after March 2013.

Nevertheless, on April 10, 2013, the Defendant received the above written complaint by mail to the Ansan Police Station, and the Defendant committed a false accusation for the purpose of having F criminal punishment.

2. According to the evidence submitted (except evidence not adopted or withdrawn due to lack of admissibility of evidence), such as the following: (a) the witness F and E’s partial statement in the court room; (b) the prosecutor’s protocol of interrogation of the suspect against the Defendant; (c) the written statement in the suspect examination protocol against the Defendant; (d) the written statement in the prosecutor’s office (Evidence No. 9); (c) the real estate sales contract; (d) the receipt (Evidence No. 18); and (e) the confirmation document (Evidence No. 18); and (e) the Defendant entered into a sales contract with E on December 24, 2012; and (e) the sales contract for the Maur Building located in