Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On June 22, 2017, at the “D” restaurant located in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the Defendant: (a) stated that the Defendant was able to walk up the Defendant, such as the slope F belonging to the Incheon Gyeyang Police Station Ecom box, who was called up after receiving 112 a report, and the horse G, who was able to take a bath to other customers; (b) stated that the Defendant was able to walk up the chest of G on two occasions in drinking, and the Defendant was able to take up the said restaurant, and (c) proposed that he was able to take back the said restaurant, and the Defendant was able to get off the Defendant’s her breast at hand when he was fright of G and f to f, and f to f to f to f to f to f to f to f to f to f and to f to f to f to f to f to f to f to f to f to f to f to f to f to f to f to her.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the prevention and suppression of crimes.
2. On June 7, 2017, at around 14:30, the Defendant, while drinking alcohol together with the victim H(38 taxes) on the street in Gyeyang-gu Incheon, Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, and on the front side of the Yongsan-gu Sports Park, committed assault against the victim, etc., leading the victim to drinking alcohol and drinking alcohol on several occasions.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made to F or G by the police;
1. A H statement;
1. Investigation report (the I telephone conversations of a harvested person);
1. Application of police officers' photographs and CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;
1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;
1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act (to the extent that the punishment for the above two crimes is aggregated);
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following sentencing shall be taken into account, etc.):
1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for observation of protection;
1. Category 1 (Obstruction of Execution of Official Duties) (Scope of Recommendation) shall interfere with the performance of official duties. (Obstruction of Execution of Official Duties.)