A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 23, 2017, at around 20:16, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, upon receiving a report from the Defendant on the 110-dong 703 of Gyeyang-gu Incheon apartment house D apartment 110-dong 703, the Defendant: (a) requested the head of the police station in the Gyeyang-gu Incheon Gyeyang Police Station E-gu, Incheon to leave the patrol vehicle with F, etc. to move the patrol vehicle while getting on and moving the patrol vehicle with F, etc., upon the Defendant’s request from the head of the police station in the Incheon Gyeyang Police Station E-gu, Incheon, to the effect that he gets a pedal under the influence of alcohol; and (b) on the back of the patrol vehicle parked in Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, Incheon; and (c) whether the person must walk, the horse is the same; and (d) whether the person is the same;

It refers to the drawing of dwarf," and the floor of which was in the driver's seat.

The F interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases by police officers when the back of the head of the F.

2. Around January 23, 2017, the Defendant was arrested as a current criminal of interference with the performance of official duties for the same reason as described in paragraph (1) on the front side of the above H He private letter or the parking lot on the same day, and the Defendant was subject to a suspended execution due to the police officer’s “influence, the police officer, etc.” against the victim F.

Salvine.

In this regard, the victim publicly insultingd the victim by referring to the large friend e.g., “h.,”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Investigation report (verification of crepits inside a string, telephone conversation, patrol car, etc.);

1. Application of related photographs and vehicle photographs Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of public duties), Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. Determination as to the Defendant and his/her defense counsel’s assertion under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act that aggravated concurrent crimes

1. The defendant and his defense counsel confirmed that the police officer did not have any act to go to the scene of criminal act after receiving a report 112, and that there is no act to go to the court, and then the act of the police officer to go to the defendant on the following grounds can be deemed legitimate execution of duty.