logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.04.29 2014고단2190
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등협박)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a worker in daily work who works related to facilities and human life, and the victim C(70 years of age) and the victim D(59 years of age) are married.

The Defendant performed pipeline construction works at the desire of the victims in the front city E at the time of the previous week, and demanded the victims to pay more amount than the original construction cost on the ground of the “additional cost” occurrence, but the victims refused to pay more amount, which led to the victims’ dissatisfaction.

1. Around November 14, 2014, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (collective intimidation, etc.) 22:42 on the street of the victims, and referred to as “the victims who are dangerous things in the nearby construction site, and “the victims who are unable to pay labor cost, and who do not have materials cost, are to open the door and open the door.” When the victims D refrain from this, they refer to the victims and victims as “this spons. Bhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh which

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles and threatened victims.

2. The Defendant continued to interfere with the performance of official duties, upon receiving a request from the president G of the former Jinjin-gu Police Station F District District of the former Jinjin-gu Police Station that received the report of the above occurrence of the incident, and caused a assault by: (a) the Defendant, “Woo kik kik kik kik kik kik kik kik kisk kisk kisk kisk kisk kisk kisk kisk kisk kisk kisk kisksk kis

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the crime prevention of police officers and the protection of people's lives, bodies and property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The defendant;

arrow