logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.08.01 2013고단2700
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months, each of the defendants B, C, and D shall be punished by a fine of 3,00,000 won.

Defendant

B, C, and D above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a game related business entity that operates a game room under the trade name of "G" on the first floor of the F building in Busan Dong-gu, and Defendant B, C, and D is an employee of the above game room.

1. No person who defendant A shall provide game products with contents different from those classified by the Game Rating Board for the distribution or use thereof;

Nevertheless, from around 09:00 on October 26, 2012 to around 15:40 on November 16, 2012, the Defendant established and operated 24 underwater game machine from the above “G” to operate business. On the game game machine, which was deliberated upon by the Game Rating Board, selected the two different types of forests among the three different types of forests on the screen by the user, and found the different types of forests over five stages, the Defendant provided a large number of customers with the modified game products, regardless of the game user’s ability. However, unlike the contents of the rating, the Defendant provided a large number of customers with the game products so that free gifts are emitted and game products are operated without the game user’s ability.

As a result, the Defendant provided game products with contents different from those rated by the Game Rating Board for use.

2. Defendant B, Defendant C, and Defendant D provided game products that are different from the classified contents as described in paragraph (1) at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) at the same time and in order to assist customers to use the game products with knowledge of the fact, they received daily allowances and managed cash withdrawals of the above game machine, and made them easy to commit the crime by exchanging scams with the customers and giving coffee scams.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to assist in the violation of the Act on Promotion of the Game Industry of the above A.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to H, I, and J;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. A report on internal investigation and an investigation report (a report on the investigation of light goods) 1.

arrow