logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.02.04 2015나2037205
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the Defendants is modified as follows. A.

The plaintiff's rehabilitation debtor.

Reasons

1. The grounds for the court’s explanation on this part of the facts are as follows. The part concerning the above defendant in the judgment of the first instance became final and conclusive because it did not appeal against the plaintiff, even though it did not appeal against the plaintiff in full, even though it did not appeal against the plaintiff for the part concerning the defendant's new defendant's new business in the first instance court's joint defendant's first instance trial's "joint defendant's new business" in No. 6 of the judgment of the first instance as "No. 23, 201, Nov. 23, 2001."

Inasmuch as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, it shall be quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

The attached Form of the judgment of the court of first instance shall not be deemed attached, and it shall not be separately attached.

2. Determination as to the claim against B by the Defendant Sung Il Construction, and by the Defendant Debtor Rehabilitation and Partnership Construction

A. According to the above facts in determining the Plaintiff’s assertion, Defendant Sung Il Construction and Debtor Rehabilitation and Dong Branch Construction are obligated to compensate the Plaintiff for damages incurred within the warranty period in the instant apartment that the said Defendants constituted a joint supply and demand organization for the damages in lieu of the defect repair. The amount of compensation for damages is KRW 301,887,270, which is equivalent to the Plaintiff’s 60% of the defect repair cost incurred in the instant apartment in the instant apartment in 503,145,451 (i.e., KRW 503,145,451 x KRW 60% of the damages compensation cost incurred in the instant apartment in 503,145,451). The same applies to the following:

Therefore, barring any special circumstance, Defendant Sung Il-il Construction and Rehabilitation Obligors Construction are jointly and severally liable to pay the Plaintiff the said KRW 301,887,270 and damages for delay thereof. 2) The exclusion period of Defendant Sung Il-il Construction and the administrator B of Defendant Sung-dong Construction, etc., and the claim (1) Defendant Sung Il-il Construction, and the administrator B of Defendant Sung-dong Construction, the debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor debtor hereinafter referred to as “Defendant custodian”).

shall be prescribed by laws, such as rules on the management of multi-family housing.

arrow