Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On July 18, 2011, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Busan District Court's Dong branch branch, and a summary order of KRW 3 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Busan District Court's Dong branch on January 22, 2013.

On October 31, 2016, around 22:10, the Defendant driven a Dsch Rexton car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.070% in blood, from around 1 kilometer to around 1 kilometer road located in the same Sinsan-si from the world beer’s “closion,” which is located in the same Sinsan-dong.

As a result, the Defendant, who had the power of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) more than twice, once again driven the said vehicle while under the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of written inquiries about criminal history and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 148-2(1)1 and 44(1) of the Act on the Selection of Punishment and the Selection of Fines [the defendant had a total of four times of punishment due to driving under drinking, etc., however, the punishment records of the two times before June 2006, where the provision on the "child who is under the influence of driving under the influence of drinking" applies. The driving of the instant drinking is a mere driving under the influence of alcohol, whose blood alcohol concentration in the blood alcohol concentration in the form of a license suspension; the Defendant supports wife and two children (five years of age and 13 years of age). The Defendant is the most favorable for the Defendant to be sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment or heavier punishment for the instant case, and considering favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant is placed in the place of work in which he/she is discharged from his/her office.]

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;