logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.12.12 2014가단3631
건물철거 등
Text

1. The Defendants are to the Plaintiff:

A. Indication 1, 2, 2 of the annexed drawings on the land of 8,595 square meters and E forest land of 15,749 square meters in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu.

Reasons

1. The facts under the recognition may be found, either in dispute between the parties or in each entry in Gap evidence 1 to 6 (including paper numbers), together with the whole purport of the pleadings.

The Plaintiff is an owner of 8,595 square meters in Daegu-gu D Forest, and 15,749 square meters in E forest (hereinafter “instant forest”).

B. On April 25, 2010, the Defendants agreed from the Plaintiff to pay the lease deposit by the end of August 2010, setting the instant forest as KRW 5 million, annual rent of KRW 4 million, and agreed to pay the lease deposit by the end of August 2010. As the rent, the Defendants paid KRW 2.2.6 million in total to the Plaintiff on July 31, 2010 and KRW 330,000,000 on March 28, 201.

C. On March 28, 2011, the Defendants concluded a lease agreement with the Plaintiff with the monthly rent of KRW 5 million, KRW 3.5 million, and KRW 5 million from March 31, 2011 to March 31, 2013, and paid KRW 5 million to the Plaintiff on the same day. However, during the lease period, rent was KRW 3.5 million on April 9, 201, KRW 400,00 on May 6, 201, KRW 500,00 on June 16, 201, KRW 400,000 on July 15, 201, KRW 500,000 on August 16, 201, KRW 3.5 million on August 16, 201, KRW 3.5 million on November 16, 201, KRW 3.5 million on the same day.

E. On the instant forest land, a vinyl (B) part of the instant forest land connected each point of 52 square meters and 75 square meters connected each point of 5, 6, 7, 8, and 5 of the said drawings are each installed on the instant forest land, which is located on the instant forest land, in sequence of the indication of the attached drawing. The Defendants jointly possess and use the instant forest land and the instant plastic houses.

F. On October 16, 2013, the Plaintiff notified Defendant C of the termination of the lease on the grounds of the expiration of the lease term and the delay of rent, and around that time, the said notification reached the Defendants.

2. Judgment on the parties' arguments

A. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff.

arrow