logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.08.12 2020고단262
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 31, 2019, between 12:00 and 12:50, the Defendant 202, “D” operated by the victim C in Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, and had other customers who visited the said place without any justifiable reason by drinking alcohol and let them take a bath out of the restaurant. At the same time, the Defendant 200 large-scale 262 was able to fluent and fluent down down the salt and down the downs.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force for about 50 minutes.

"200 Highest 1978"

1. On December 23, 2019, the Defendant committed the crime: (a) around 10:57 on December 23, 2019, the Defendant returned to the “G” car center operated by the Victim F in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si E, Suwon-si.

The Defendant continued to smoke tobacco, returned to the workplace, and was unable to operate a vehicle by stopping the vehicle after the victim's vehicle seeking emergency mobilization, even though the Defendant was requested to keep inflammable materials, such as oil, at the above car center workplace, etc.

The Defendant was unable to avoid a disturbance for 2 hours by continuously attempting to enter the car center in front of the victim, and committing a large voice.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's car center business by force.

2. On February 25, 2020, around 18:38 on February 25, 2020, the Defendant found the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol to “I” on the first floor of H in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si. However, the Defendant was rejected the Defendant’s position on the ground that he was the state of exploitation from the victim J, an employee.

However, the Defendant, without leaving, continued to do 12 minutes in front of the Accounting Unit, and led the victim to “I am hyna, I am hyna, I am hyna, I am hynas, I am hynas, I am hynas, I am hynas, I am hynas.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the business of the victim such as the victim's letter or the customer's response.

arrow