beta
Text
1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months;
Seized evidence 7 shall be confiscated.
2. Defendant B.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B On October 5, 2018, the Daegu District Court was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of false entry into public electronic records, etc., and the judgment was finalized on October 13, 2018.
1. On September 2017, Defendant A received a proposal from F, a village of external residence, to “to open a passbook in the name of a juristic person and sell it to the operating team of an illegal gambling site at an amount not less than one passbook after opening a passbook in the name of a juristic person.” Defendant A prepared documents on the establishment of a juristic person, such as the articles of incorporation, written acceptance of office, and certificate of personal seal impression, and the Defendant submitted the above documents to the competent registry office, and opened a passbook in the name of the juristic person. Defendant A conspired to sell them to the name-free persons who operate the gambling site after obtaining the means of access, such as the passbook and physical card, from the Defendant.
On September 13, 2017, according to the above public offering, the Defendant prepared documents necessary for the registration of incorporation, such as the Defendant’s certificate of personal seal impression, certificate of personal seal impression, bank balance certificate, etc., and documents necessary for the registration of incorporation of “A” or “GGGGGGGGG,” which are recorded as “A” or “auditor”, using the Defendant’s certificate of personal seal impression, certificate of personal seal impression, bank balance certificate, etc., and submitted them to a public official in charge of knowledge of such fact. On the same day, the said public official had the said public official enter the same contents as the above application in the “G corporate register,” and had the said registration office preserve the above corporate register, which is a public electronic record, from around that time.
As a result, the Defendant conspired with F in collusion with F, and is a public official twice in total as shown in [1] List of Offenses] on the same day.