1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

3. The total cost of the lawsuit.

1. Judgment on the ground of the plaintiff's claim

A. The gist of the argument is that the Plaintiff was introduced by the Defendant C, the president of the Defendant Association B (hereinafter “Defendant Association”) through D in 201, which is the chairperson of the Defendant Association, through D in 2011. The Defendant C, “E Research Center is able to commercialize at the world’s highest LED production technology development stage, and thus, if it is supplied in a large amount to apartment parking lots, etc., it would lead to a serious business feasibility. The designation of the LED lighting company to be invested shall be made by the Defendant Association, and it shall be made a stock company F (hereinafter “F”), the representative director of the Defendant Association, and even if the Plaintiff made an investment by means of remitting KRW 40 million to the account of the Defendant Association, the Plaintiff did not entirely proceed with the production technology development project, and the Defendant C, who did not intend to conduct the project, was jointly and severally liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages equivalent to the amount of 400 million won invested by the Plaintiff, and thus, Defendant C, the Plaintiff’s director of the Defendant Association, as the Plaintiff’s director, who paid damages to the Plaintiff.

B. In full view of the overall purport of the arguments in the statement No. 3-1 to No. 4, the Plaintiff is deemed to have transferred KRW 400 million to the national bank account under the name of the Defendant Association for the investment in the development project of the production technology of PED lighting, but the Plaintiff is deemed to have never intended to run the above project even though Defendant C did not intend to do so.