Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 14, 2017, around 17:10, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force between about 30 minutes, such as where the Defendant, while drinking in the “D” food store operated by the victim C (52 years old) in Gwangju City, was breading a large amount of glass, and was breading in the table of the table, and was breading in the table of the table, and obstructed the victim’s restaurant business.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the same time and place as Paragraph 1, and at the same time and place, was reported by the said victim and sent out to the police station E box of Gwangju Police Station F, who was in charge of the patrol box, attempted to take the Defendant back, and “Is the blag, Is the blag.”

“Along with sound, the chest part of the police officer’s chest was clicked at least three times on the part of the police officer’s chest, and the floor of the hand was blicked at the right hand once, etc.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement with respect to C and F;

1. A written statement of C and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing criminal video CDs;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment (the fact that the victim of the obstruction of duty does not want the punishment of the defendant, the fact that the victim appears to be a contingent crime in the state of his/her main action, the degree of violence against police officers is not very severe, the absence of records of the same crime, and other conditions of sentencing prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act shall be taken into consideration);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;