A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 12, 2017, at around 03:30 on July 12, 2017, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s main store business by force, such as following the table table, which was put on the floor and the wall, without any justifiable reason while drinking alcohol at 7 studio of D amusement shop operated by the victim C, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s main store business by force.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the date and time, at the place, as described in paragraph 1, reported by 112 that the customer was under the influence of alcohol and interfered with the customer’s business, and reported by F of the circumstances belonging to the E District of the police station assigned to the police station called up, to confirm the details of the report to the victim, and “I am to us. I am h, low interest, and low interest. The death shall be discarded.

Dud funch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch.

Sending

We see this dog’s desire to “I” and see this dog, the police officer’s breath was scam and was scamed to scam and walk the chest of the police officer, thereby hindering the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the duty of reporting and processing the police officer’s 112 report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and C;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act: The scope of final sentencing due to multiple concurrent crimes (one to one year) in the basic area (one to six months) (one year and six months) of the basic area (any person subject to special sentencing) [the scope of recommending punishment] [the scope of recommending punishment] that there is no person subject to special sentencing]; the basic area (one month to one year and six months) of the basic area (no person subject to special sentencing] of the first type (any person subject to special sentencing) (one month and one year and six months): the nature of the crime of this case and the circumstances of the crime of this case from six months to two years [the decision of sentence], but the defendant did not be disadvantaged.