Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the actual operator of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building B and the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd.

A person who has obtained permission for trucking transport business shall obtain permission from the Minister of Oceans and Fisheries for change of permitted matters, such as the number of trucks.

On February 17, 2016, the Defendant changed the matters of permission from the office of the F organization in Songpa-gu Seoul E building and the office of the fifth floor to a general truck prohibited from increasing the number of trucks, but operated the trucking transport business without obtaining permission from the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, as shown in the attached Table of Crimes List, even though the Defendant changed the matters of permission nine times from around that time to March 18, 2016, as shown in the attached Table of Crimes List, even though he did not obtain permission from the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G and H;

1. According to the accusation, the permit for trucking transport business, and the list of illegally scrapped vehicles [the 2009 Notice No. 2008-782 of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport], the judgment on the assertion of the defendant and the defense counsel is reasonable, considering that the person who registered the previous trucking transport business is deemed to have obtained the permission of the Minister of Construction and Transportation under Article 5 of the Addenda to the Trucking Transport Business Act (Act No. 7100, Jan. 20, 2004) of the Addenda to the Trucking Transport Business Act, the vehicle of this case is a special truck for limited supply permitted for increase of the number of vehicles]

1. Summary of the assertion

A. The replacement of a vehicle to be used for a transport service as stated in the Defendant’s facts constituting the replacement of a vehicle for the vehicle and thus constitutes an alteration of minor matters under the proviso of Article 3(3) of the Trucking Transport Business Act, and thus is deemed sufficient only by the report

Article 67 of the Trucking Transport Business Act.