Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 7, 2018, around 23:00 on March 7, 2018, the Defendant was unable to pay the alcohol value to the Defendant despite the absence of the intent to visit the victim D to the amusement establishments operated by the victim D in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E, to pay the alcohol value.

The evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is not presented to the prosecutor, but this part is not inferred;

With the same attitude to pay the drinking value in a normal condition, the victim ordered drinking and drinking to the victim.

The Defendant: (a) deceiving the victim as above; (b) did not pay the amount to be paid even after being provided with three amusement receptions; and (c) acquired financial benefits equivalent to the amount to be paid, as the Defendant did not pay the amount to the victim.

2. On March 8, 2018, from around 02:00 to around 03:02, the Defendant, who interfered with his/her business, failed to calculate that “at least there had been a large amount of drinking values” at the same place as paragraph 1, in the same manner as that of paragraph 1, and is flick h.p. confinement.

Finally until the end, humnasium, such as "humnas.", and humnasty caused disturbance to interfere with normal work, such as management of victim D's entertainment establishments by force.

3. On March 8, 2018, at the same place as paragraph 1, around 02:40 on March 8, 2018, the Defendant: (a) whether the Defendant received money from the police officer F, a police officer dispatched among employees of E stations and six customers; (b) whether the Defendant received a report on the agreement to fill the business place;

50 Sheets, flap and flaps, not later than 50.

The term "publicly insulting the victim by speaking in a large sound."

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement

1. D Legal statement was known that the Defendant provided additional alcoholic beverages exceeding time and imposed additional charges at the entertainment drinking point.

Even if so, it is not possible to recognize the drinking value additionally imposed, and only claims the payment of the amount that cannot be accepted by the victim, but did not seem to have the attitude to pay the drinking value.

In order to pay the drinking value presented by the victim to the defendant.