1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following judgments to the fourth and tenth parts of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

【Additional Statement: (In addition, Defendant B, Defendant A, and a person acting as a broker for them are presumed to have received so-called so-called “bee” in return for the conclusion of the fishery products supply contract against D. The Plaintiff, who is the party to such unlawful transaction, asserts that it is contrary to the good faith principle to claim the price for the goods against the Defendants who are joint business operators without claiming the price for the goods against the deceased E’s successors.

There is no evidence to acknowledge that rebates has been received between the Plaintiff and Defendant A, etc.

Therefore, this part of Defendant B’s assertion is without merit to further examine.

[Judgment]

2. Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance that accepted all the Plaintiff’s claims against the Defendants is justifiable. Thus, all appeals by the Defendants are dismissed as they are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.