logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.07.21 2016구합62475
이주대책대상자 부적격자 선정처분 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 23, 2005, the head of Pyeongtaek-si published a public inspection announcement on D residents' public inspection. On September 21, 2006, the Minister of Construction and Transportation designated and published the Pyeongtaek-si F, G, H, I, and J members as D zones and housing site development district, and on May 30, 2008, the Minister of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs announced the K-ro name and land development district announced by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, and announced the Gyeonggi-do Governor, the Gyeonggi-do Governor, the President of the Korea Land Corporation, and the change of district designation and development plan to change the project implementer.

The amount calculated by subtracting the cost of installing basic living facilities at an ordinary level under the Compensation Act from the cost of creating a housing site (or an association formed by a person subject to supply of a housing site) for the supply of one piece of land for one household (one piece of land if the same household with the same household owns two or more houses) and the cost of installing basic living facilities at an ordinary level under the Compensation Act due to the execution of the project, as a result of the exclusion from the supply of one piece of land for one household (one piece of land if the same household with the same household owns two or more houses) from the cost of public inspection of the residents of the D district for one year before the date of public inspection and announcement ( December 23, 2005).

B. Around May 2014, the Defendant, as the executor of the instant development project (hereinafter “instant development project”), established and publicly announced relocation measures (supply of migrants’ housing sites) for residents who were deprived of their base of livelihood due to the instant project, as follows.

C. The Plaintiff is an owner who purchased on April 7, 1989 and completed the registration of ownership transfer on April 10, 1989, three bonds on the ground of Pyeongtaek-si Lone in the instant business area (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant house”) and its site.

The defendant is not the defendant.

arrow