logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.08.18 2016구합61885
이주대책대상자제외처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 23, 2005, the head of Pyeongtaek-si publicly announced on the public inspection of residents C in Pyeongtaek-si B, and on September 21, 2006, the Minister of Construction and Transportation designated and publicly announced the Pyeongtaek-si, F, G, H, and I as C zone and housing site development area, and on May 30, 2008, the Minister of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs announced the Jin-si name as K zone and housing site development area, the project implementer, the Gyeonggi-do Governor, the President of the Korea Land Corporation, and the defendant to change the district designation and development plan.

1) Since one year prior to the date of public inspection by the residents of the C District (or the date of adjudication of expropriation) supplying the housing site of the migrants, the ownership of the housing continuously and continuously resided in the housing concerned (or the date of adjudication of expropriation) by the date of conclusion of the indemnity agreement, and the owner of the building without permission, corporation, or organization relocated due to the implementation of the project after receiving compensation for the said housing from the project implementer, excluded from the owner of the building without permission, corporation, or organization that has waived the right to be supplied with the housing site among the persons subject to special supply of the housing site, and requested the special supply of the housing site from the date of public inspection by the residents of the C District (or the date of adjudication of expropriation on December 23, 2005) who had continuously owned the housing and resided in the housing until the date of conclusion of the indemnity agreement (or the date of adjudication of expropriation). The owner of the building without permission, corporation, organization, among those subject to the payment of the resettlement funds and requested the payment of the special settlement funds.

B. Around May 2014, the Defendant, as the executor of the above development project (hereinafter “instant project”), established and publicly announced three types of relocation measures, including ① supply of multi-resident housing sites (self-unit housing sites), ② special supply of housing, ③ payment of resettlement subsidies, etc. regarding the instant project. The criteria for the selection of the person subject to relocation measures are December 23, 2005, which is the date of announcement for public inspection by the residents of the district C, and the persons subject to each of the above types are as follows.

arrow