logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.05.02 2013고단1429
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a low-speed car.

On March 8, 2013, the Defendant driven the said car with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.128% 0.128% while under the influence of alcohol around 16:40 on March 8, 2013, and led to the driving of the said car in the direction of the shooting distance of the East-gu Hospital in front of the funeral hall of the country of the Republic of Gwangju-gu, Seoul, along two-lanes.

In case of changing a lane to a person engaged in driving service, if it is likely to obstruct the passage of a motor vehicle under way, it shall not change course, and if it is possible to change the lane, the driver has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by changing the lane safely, such as using the direction, etc. in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and changed the lane to a one-lane without examining whether a motor vehicle is running in the same lane, and caused the victim E (hereinafter referred to as 45 years old) who is driving along the one-lane to the right side of the motor vehicle in Dro vehicle which the victim C (hereinafter referred to as 45 years old) faced with the part of the upper left back part of the motor vehicle driving in front of the front right side of the motor vehicle in Dro vehicle, and caused the abovero vehicle to go beyond the center line and go beyond the opposite one, and caused the abovero vehicle to go beyond the opposite one, and caused the victim E (hereinafter referred to as 64 years old) to shock the part of the front end part of the motor vehicle in front of the road in front of the air-lane zone in the opposite part of the two-lane vehicle in the opposite part.

The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, suffered diversous salt ties and tensions to the victim C in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, etc., and the victim G (the son, 64 years of age) who was on board the said pressal mix, tensions, etc., requiring approximately three weeks of treatment to the victim E, and the victim G (the son, 64 years of age) who was on board the said pressal marium and tensions, respectively.

arrow