A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

On November 21, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and six years and six months in Seoul Southern District Court for fraud, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 27, 2014.

From August 2011 to September 201, the Defendant operated a mobile phone store with "E" on the Songpa-gu Seoul and 1st floor and D1st floor in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Around August 22, 2011, the Defendant: (a) at the above E store located in C, the Defendant: (b) provided the mobile phone without opening the mobile phone; (c) provided the mobile phone under the pretext of inducing a large number of unspecified persons to subscribe to the mobile phone; (d) provided a copy, etc. of the resident registration certificate from the nominal owner; and (e) opened the mobile phone using it; and (e) planned to distribute the mobile phone as a “largephone”; and (e) provided the cell phone from the victim ME Global Co., Ltd., even if the Defendant did not wish to sell it normally, the Defendant, who directly made a telephone call with the victim company, was clearly recognized by the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor, who is not the employee of the Defendant but the Defendant, and the Defendant also led the Defendant to all charges; and (c) made a false statement to the effect that “on the face of the supply of the mobile phone by entering into a mobile phone consignment contract, the Defendant would sell the mobile phone and make the payment thereof.”

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the employees G of the victimized company, received 93 mobile phones totaling KRW 76,546,500 from August 22, 201 to September 16, 201 from the employees G of the victimized company, and acquired 93 mobile phones totaling KRW 76,546,50 from around August 22, 201 to September 16, 201.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The part concerning F's statement among the interrogation protocol of the second prosecutor's office against the defendant

1. A copy of each police's protocol of examination of the suspect regarding F (including the G's statement contents, Nos. 30, 31);

1. G.