logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2011. 05. 25. 선고 2010누39757 판결
실지양도가액 및 감정가액을 확인할 수 없어 기준시가로 양도소득세를 과세한 처분은 적법함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Administrative Court 2010Gudan4684 ( October 19, 2010)

Case Number of the previous trial

early 209west2378 ( December 28, 2009)

Title

The disposition imposing capital gains tax on the standard market price is legitimate because the actual transfer value and the appraisal value cannot be confirmed.

Summary

(As in the judgment of the court of first instance) The actual transfer value cannot be confirmed in full view of the fact that it is difficult to view it as a true sales contract because the content that the obligation to take over the collateral security obligation is not specified at all, and the disposition imposing capital gains tax on the transfer value and acquisition value as the standard market price is legitimate because there is no appraisal value.

Cases

2010Nu39757 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff and appellant

XX Kim

Defendant, Appellant

port of origin

Judgment of the first instance court

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2010Gudan4684 decided October 19, 2010

Conclusion of Pleadings

May 4, 2011

Imposition of Judgment

May 25, 2011

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The imposition of capital gains tax of KRW 215,491,040 against the plaintiff on March 17, 2009 by the defendant shall be revoked.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows: (a) considering all evidence submitted by the court of first instance as evidence No. 15, and adding the fact that it is insufficient to reverse the judgment of the court of first instance even after adding the statement of No. 15 to the evidence submitted by the court of first instance is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance; (b) therefore, (c)

Since the judgment of the first instance is justifiable, the appeal filed by the plaintiff is dismissed.

arrow