logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.12.04 2015가합103235
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Defendant B’s KRW 262,977,00 as well as 5% per annum from May 23, 2015 to December 4, 2015, respectively, to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On March 14, 2003, Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which acquired the special allotment right of Defendant B, promoted the project with the authorization of the implementation of the F Project, which is an urban planning project, on March 14, 2003, and in the project site, Defendant B was scheduled to remove the building because it had a residential unauthorized building in the project site.

Accordingly, Defendant B becomes a person eligible for the special supply of national housing, etc. for the owners of removed houses under Article 19(1)3(c) of the former Housing Construction Promotion Act (wholly amended by Act No. 6916, Jun. 29, 2003; hereinafter the same) with the delegation of the former Housing Construction Promotion Act (wholly amended by Act No. 6916, the same) and became a person eligible for the special supply of national housing, etc. on September 23, 2003. Accordingly, Defendant B acquired the status of receiving the special supply of national housing, etc., which is granted as relocation measures following the removal of unauthorized buildings (hereinafter “the instant special purchase right”).

B. The parties’ relationship 1) Defendant D is the real estate brokerage office in the name of “H real estate” in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G (hereinafter “instant brokerage office”).

Defendant C is a licensed real estate agent, who was employed by Defendant D from around 2007 to engage in brokerage services in the instant brokerage office. ii) The Plaintiff’s mother is the South-North her mother.

C. Around January 2007, the Plaintiff’s agent of the sales contract between the Plaintiff and K visited the instant brokerage office in order to purchase the status of receiving a special supply of national housing, such as the instant special sale right.

On the other hand, K purchased the special purchase right of this case from the father of the defendant B, and had colored the buyer through L to resell it.

Defendant D introduced K through L to I, and I concluded with K to purchase the special parcel of land in the name of Defendant B at KRW 185 million (hereinafter “instant special parcel of land”).

arrow