1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

On February 21, 2012, the Plaintiff submitted a written complaint to the CEU trial branch of the Korea Labor Association under the Defendant’s control against the Korea Labor Association Chairman E, E, E’s wife F, the above church Staff G, the non-permanent office H, I, and the non-permanent office J.

On December 30, 2012, on the grounds that, on the grounds that, on December 30, 2012, E participated in the meeting of the Council of Labor, K, which is short of qualification, was present at the meeting of the Council of Labor, was forged or altered, and threatened with the members of the Council, E was subject to a punishment of suspension of participation in the case of acceptance during one year from the suspension of office and one year from office for the above church, and that G damaged the Plaintiff’s honor and disturbed the church, etc., G was subject to a punishment of withdrawal from school, and the Plaintiff’s complaint against F, H, I, and J was dismissed (hereinafter “the first judgment of the Labor Union").

On the other hand, on October 11, 2012, E filed a complaint against the Plaintiff with the CEU trial division. On December 30, 2012, the CEU trial division rendered a ruling that the Plaintiff would be punished for three months of suspension from office on the grounds that the Plaintiff was recognized as a party member when the Plaintiff was a party member at the time of L as a party member, the Plaintiff’s personal relationship as an armed force shall be comprehensively examined, the scenarios or morality shall be prevented, and the Plaintiff’s religious belief shall be attempted to take account of his/her members, and verbal abuse, violence, and homicide shall be acknowledged (hereinafter “the Second E judgment”).

E, G, H, I, J, and F (hereinafter referred to as “E, etc.”) appealed against the decision of the Trade Union. The appeal submitted by E, etc. is written by the Plaintiff as the respondent, and the first decision of the Trade Union is written in the decision of the original court that became the subject of appeal. The appeal column is unfair compared to the punishment that the Plaintiff received in the second decision of the Trade Union.