The instant lawsuit is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

(a) C is an employee of B who enters into an entrustment contract with D Post to act on behalf of the delivery of parcel-post items, and E is an individual entrepreneur who enters into an entrustment contract with the post office logistics support group to act on behalf of the delivery of parcel-post items;

B. The National Central Administrative Appeals Commission, which belongs to the civil rights committee, sent a registration mail to the Plaintiff to return documents related to administrative trials, and one of them was dealt with on September 16, 2019, and on September 18, 2019, the remainder was signed and sealed as if all the Plaintiff received.

However, the above signature was signed on behalf of the plaintiff by placing the mail in the delivery place even though E and C were in the absence of the plaintiff.

(c)

On November 18, 2019, the Plaintiff submitted to the Defendant a written request to reprimand the person concerned, by mail, by ascertaining whether the Defendant is responsible for the failure to deliver the registered mail properly, or whether the Defendant is in the competent post office or is in the logistics enterprise.

The above request was served on the defendant on the following day.

(d)

On November 25, 2019, the F convening officer, who is the defendant's employee, re-designated the processing department of the civil petition filed by the plaintiff to support the operation of the state's business support department of the Giman local government, and to the office of door-to-door distribution planning team of the post office logistics support group as the foundation, and transferred the above civil petition to the full-time decision.

E. On November 21, 2019, the Plaintiff submitted a civil petition regarding the voluntary delivery after signing by C at the National Newspaper.

On December 3, 2019, the Administrator of the Gyeong-man Regional Postal Administration sent a reply to the reply (the plaintiff submitted the result of the response in Gap evidence No. 4), and this includes the following: (a) the delivery source C was voluntarily delivered on the ground that the delivery source C did not have the contact address of the plaintiff and that it was the most prompt delivery method; and (b) the head of the Gyeong-man Regional Postal Administration sent a strict attention to C.

F. The Plaintiff is a national newspaper E around November 2019.