1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B (Appointed Party) is within the scope of the property inherited from the network C, 44,069,966 won.

1. As to the claim against the defendant A

A. Indication of claims: It is as shown in the Attached Form “Cause of Claim”.

(b) Judgment on deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. According to the overall purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including paper numbers), Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 as to the claims against defendant (Appointed Party) D and Appointed B, and according to the overall purport of the arguments and arguments as to the whole, it can be acknowledged that the defendant (Appointed Party) D and Appointed B are stated in the "reasons for Claim" and "the changed cause for Claim". Thus, the defendant (Appointed Party) D and Selected Party B are within the scope of the property inherited from the deceased C.

paragraphs 1 and 2.

have the obligation to pay the money set forth in the subsection.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant (appointed party) D and Appointor B is justified.