1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Basic Facts

On 190, the Plaintiff organized a community (hereinafter “instant community”) with the Defendants (3), F, G, H, I, J (Plaintiff’s wife), K, L, M, M, N,O (Name: P), Q (Name: : T: T), S (Opening: : T), U (Opening: :V), and as a leader of the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant community”), and began to live together in Yangsan City.

around April 1990, the Plaintiff, the Defendants, and the members of the instant community began to manufacture the industrial distribution complex in the trade name of Defendant B as the representative of Defendant B, and continued to operate the said business with the trade name of “X” as the representative of “X” around 191. On around 1993, the Plaintiff, the Defendants, and the members of the instant community were converted the “X”, a personal company, into the “E” corporation.

Since then, E Co., Ltd. increased its capital in the aggregate of KRW 850 million on January 18, 1996, KRW 1999.10 million on October 19, 199, KRW 169 billion on November 16, 199, KRW 100,000 on December 2, 199, KRW 130,000 on December 13, 199, and KRW 30,000 on January 9, 2008.

E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant company”) was established around October 16, 1993. At the time of its establishment, the Plaintiff was registered in the register of shareholders as holding 51% (5,100 shares/10,00 shares),O, F, N, G, K, Defendant B, and Defendant C each 7% (70 shares/100 shares/00 shares) of the total shares, and until now, the share certificates have not been issued.

F, G, and H deviate from the community life of this case, and thereafter, F transferred the shares of the company of this case held by each of them to Defendant D, and H transferred them to Defendant D, and H transferred them to Defendant B.

K also transferred the shares of the Company to Defendant B, and such transfer and b.

As of December 13, 2011, the shareholders listed in the shareholder registry of the instant company were 51% (91,800 shares/180,000 shares), Defendant B21% (37,800 shares/180,000 shares), Defendant C, Defendant D, N, andO respectively (12,600 shares/180,000 shares).

The plaintiff and the defendants, other than the plaintiff, have a dispute over the operation method, operation direction, etc. of the company of this case and the community of this case.