A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 23:30, 2013, the Defendant knew that the victim D(the age of 52) of an internal-related person D had contact with a woman previously talked by the Defendant, and knew that the victim D(the age of 52) was in contact with the female at the time of the Defendant, the Defendant followed the Defendant, and tried to remove the victim's face, walking the victim's clothes on the floor, walking the victim's head, walking the victim's face at a number of times, walking the victim's face on the floor, cutting the victim's head, taking the victim's head, and then put the victim's face again in drinking, and then put the victim's face again, taking about four weeks of closed cage where treatment is needed for about four weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victims;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

2. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Considering the following reasons for sentencing).

3. In light of the circumstances of the instant case, degree of violence, etc., the Defendant’s crime of sentencing on the grounds of the order to provide community service and attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, and Article 59-3 of the Probation, etc. Act appears to be a unilateral violent event for the Defendant’s pooling, and on the grounds of such motive, the crime of the instant crime committed by the victim, in particular, female victims, and the faceing part of the face, making the victim’s satise and satise the victim’s satise and satise the victim’s bones

However, the execution of the sentence against the defendant is suspended only once in consideration of the victim's position because the victim's wife is the defendant's wife.