A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

The Chairperson, the victim C (the 51-year old) was the owner of Boban Port D and was a member of the above Federation.

On May 13, 2019, at around 16:10, the Defendant got off the victim’s face with b office, a corporate body E and 2 stories, and her hand, her franchis, and her franchis, her bat around the floor, and her franchis of the victim.

As a result, the defendant tried to provide the victim with a multi-faceted scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics and scopic scopic scopic scopic sp

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of penalty against the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion about Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution (see, e.g., the agreement with the victim) and the defendant's defense counsel asserted that there was an assault against the victim, but the victim was merely a frighter due to the cryp disease that had already been suffering, so there was no injury to the victim.

However, in full view of the following circumstances, the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court: (a) the victim testified to the effect that the victim suffered an injury by drinking his face; (b) the dentist, who treated the victim, testified to the effect that the victim suffered damage to the organization of support due to a dental disease; and (c) the dentist, who did not have the son, did not cause damage to the organization of support due to a dental disease; and (d) if the victim was spawned after the assault case, he could be inferred that the Defendant’s assault was caused by an increase in the Abrupta, and thus, if the victim was spawned after the assault case, he could be inferred by considering the fact-finding.