A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From September 2016 to the end of the same year, the Defendant had a relationship with the victim C.

1. From September 27, 2016 to October 3, 2016, the Defendant embezzled the victim’s property equivalent to KRW 8,858,300 in total three times, as stated in attached Table 1-3, from September 23, 2016 to October 3, 2016, when he/she received remittance of KRW 3 million from the new bank account under the name of the Defendant to be used in performing loan business for the repayment of the victim’s obligation from the victim to the new bank account in the name of the Defendant, and kept for the victim, from September 27, 2016 to October 2016.

2. On October 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around Gwangju (hereinafter “Seoul”); (b) around October 7, 2016, the Defendant: (c) paid the Defendant a debt with profits, as “The Defendant may see three to four times the principal in the event of betting in the sports territory; and (d) he/she may do so.

There is a legally operated site, and friendly Gu inform her of the work of the site.

On the other hand, the agent can be 100% of the conditions of the agent.

It is intended to pay money by holding sports discussions.

The information made a false statement that does not lose money, and if you lose money, they will be liable for it.

However, in fact, the Defendant was engaged in hosting on the private sports soil site operated illegally, and there was no particular information that could make profits, and there was no way to make profits from the principal more than three to four times. The Defendant did not have a certain income. The real estate under the name of the Defendant was already seized, the right to collateral security was established, and there was no other specific property, thereby receiving money from the injured party.

the principal has no intention or ability to guarantee the principal.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and thereby, 3 million won from the victim's account under the name of the defendant.