The appeal by prosecutor and defendant shall be dismissed.

1. As to the summary of the grounds for appeal, the prosecutor asserts that the prosecutor is too unfasible and unfair, and the defendant is too unfasible and unfair.

2. The fact that the defendant has the same kind of power four times to determine, and thereby commits the instant crime during the period of repeated crime is disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, considering the fact that the defendant is led to the crime in this case due to the depression during pregnancy, the defendant's husband is not negligent in managing the defendant in the future, and the defendant's husband's father and two children who were born before several months are needed. The court below already determined the punishment in consideration of the above circumstances, and there is no change of circumstances that could vary between the court below and the punishment in the trial, and other factors that are conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, character and character, intelligence and environment, family relationship, motive, means and consequence of the crime in this case, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment shall be deemed appropriate.

Therefore, the prosecutor and the defendant's assertion of unreasonable sentencing is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.