The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is too unfilled and unreasonable.

2. In full view of the following factors: (a) the degree of indecent act in this case is relatively heavy and the defendant is divided in depth; (b) there is no criminal history and sexual crime committed by the defendant; (c) the defendant is a person of distinguished service to the State who has rendered distinguished service to the State prescribed by the Act; (d) the defendant is aged 68 years old; and (e) his family members are living well in the future; and (e) the defendant's age, character, character, family environment, motive and circumstance of the crime; (b) the means and consequence of the crime; and (c) the application of the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court Sentencing Committee, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, family environment; and (d) other various sentencing conditions as shown in the argument in this case, including the conditions before and after the crime

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.