Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 19:00 on March 13, 2012, Defendant A damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts to G to the effect that “F disposed of Liber, at the time of the disposal of Liber in scrap metal, and at the time of the construction of a children’s playter, the road packing, and at the time of the construction of a children’s playter, it would have reduced if possible.”

2. On January 2012, Defendant B damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by stating that “F is likely to be imprisoned due to rain on the scrap metal,” although there was no fact that the victim F did not commit a corruption.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F, H and G;

1. Application of each investigation report and notification of reasons for non-prosecution Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. The Defendants: Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act; Articles 307(2) and 307(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Defendants and defense counsel’s assertion on the assertion of the Defendants and defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act asserted to the effect that the illegality of the Defendants should be avoided because the contents stated by each Defendants are true and solely for the public interest, as stated in the facts constituting a crime.

According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the defendants can sufficiently recognize the above contents as false facts, and the defendants misleads the defendants as true facts.

Even if the Defendants were to make the above statements, the circumstances leading up to the Defendants and all the circumstances acknowledged according to the above evidence are considered.