logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.07.03 2015고정998
자동차손해배상보장법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 26, 2014, at around 08:20, the Defendant operated a motor vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance, etc. from the Defendant’s house located in Daegu Suwon-gu B to the front of a postnatal care center located in the same Gu C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on mandatory insurance;

1. Relevant Article 46(2)2 and the main text of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (amended by Act No. 12987, Jan. 6, 2015); the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of the E-mail vehicle.

On December 26, 2014, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle at a speed of 08:20, and led to the six-lanes in front of the Child Care Center D in Daegu, Daegu, along with four-lanes from the direction of the two o-distance to the upper Ne-distance.

Since there is an intersection near the intersection, and there is an intersection where signal lights are installed in the front section, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to reduce speed and prevent the accident by driving the signal well in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went through as is, due to the negligence of the Defendant, brought the back part of the G Lasta car driven by F which was driven by F in the atmosphere of the signal signal at the bend, into the front part of the said cargo vehicle driven by the Defendant, and due to the shock of the said vehicle in the future, led the victim H, who was stopped in the future, to string the following back of the I BM740Li car owned by the victim H, and string it annually.

Ultimately, the Defendant damaged the above BM740LI car to cover KRW 14,122,580 of the repair cost, such as the exchange of back-of-the-jobs by occupational negligence as above.

2. Such a board shall fall under Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act.

arrow