All appeals filed by the Defendants and the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case [the position of the Defendants] Defendant A was elected as the head of F Gun at the simultaneous local elections over the country on May 31, 2006 and the simultaneous local elections over the country on June 2, 2010, respectively. On June 4, 2014, Defendant A was again elected as the head of F Gun on the sixth simultaneous local elections over the country on June 4, 2014, and has overall control over military affairs, such as F Gun personnel affairs, finance, construction, and residents’ welfare.

Defendant

B From April 1, 2009 to August 12, 2012, from the F military administration’s construction and disaster prevention restoration system, B took charge of disaster prevention duties, such as guidance and supervision of “G and improvement projects”, under the F military administration’s construction and disaster prevention restoration system. From August 13, 2012, from around August 13, 2012, the F military administration’s construction and civil engineering and supervision over the overall performance of civil engineering, such as small facility flood damage restoration works, etc., were promoted to Grade V (office) facilities around July 20, 2013, and served as the head of the F military infrastructure project.

[Criminal facts]

A. A person who intends to divert the Defendants’ farmland in violation of the farmland law and the National Land Planning and Utilization Act shall obtain permission from the competent administrative office.

In addition, a person who intends to engage in development activities, such as changing the form and quality of one land, shall obtain permission from the competent administrative office.

Defendant

A around February 22, 2010, around 22, 2010, he thought that his dry field can be seen changed so that he can lickly licked, such as the land for the road where the dry field, including J and K, leads to the old road, and the land for the road where the dry field, including J and K, leads to the old road, and the land for the farm road immediately adjoining to the old road, and the land for the soil, sprinking the paddy field, and blocking the view of the road and the view of the farm.

In the early September 2010, Defendant A received a report from the F Gun Transportation Director L of F Gun Transportation Division L of F Gun Construction to “the construction of sand at the G construction site,” and notified Defendant A of the method of disposal of sand, such as the embankment shape, height, and width, which would be developed into the field of dry field in the field.”

L is the case where Defendant A was the case of Defendant B.