logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 2014.11.04 2013나6773
손해배상
Text

1. At the request of a change in exchange at the trial, the plaintiff's lawsuit takes place against the defendant M&D Co., Ltd.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation on this part of the basic facts is as follows: "A & B" of No. 16 of the judgment of the court of first instance No. 3, "A & 6,8 and 9" of No. 6, "A through No. 8, 9, 11, and 12, and "No. 6" of No. 3, No. 16 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "A & 6, 8, 9, 11 and 12 shall be written, and it shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the addition of ".." as stated in the part corresponding to the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in No. 3, No. 16 of the judgment of the court of second instance.

(1) On April 16, 2014, the Seoul Central District Court was declared bankrupt on April 16, 2014, and the trustee in bankruptcy of the construction of the defendant walls taken over the proceedings of this case by the defendant administrator.

2) On July 1, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a report on the instant claim amounting to KRW 1,261,316,60, and the interest amount of KRW 290,690,281, which is the claim claim amount, as bankruptcy claim, in the bankruptcy procedure for the construction of an apartment complex. However, on August 14, 2014, the Plaintiff raised an objection against the Plaintiff’s bankruptcy claim report on the instant bankruptcy claim at the claim inspection date for the instant bankruptcy procedure held on August 14, 2014.

2. The grounds for the court's explanation on this part of the dispute concerning defects are as follows: "The result of each appraisal by the appraiser B, the result of the fact inquiry by the same appraiser as the result of each appraisal by the appraiser B by the court of first instance, the result of the fact inquiry by the same appraiser by the court of first instance, the result of the fact inquiry by the same appraiser as the court of first instance, and the "in light of the absence of "in light of the absence, etc." in the 7th and 9th of the 7th of the 7th of the 9th of the 7th of the 9th of the 15th of the 15th of the 15th of the 10th trial."

arrow