logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.12.22 2014가합9286
손해배상
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. In around 2007, when the Plaintiff was recommended to perform correctional treatment in order to secure a space for spawning, the Plaintiff was placed in the dental clinic located in the Gunpo-si C (hereinafter “Defendant Council member”) and was first visited and consulted with the above Council member on April 14, 2007.

B. On May 11, 2007, the Plaintiff applied again to the Defendant’s Assembly member. The Defendant took a radioactive image, such as pnoma and pact, to ascertain the Plaintiff’s state of dental, and taken a photo of the mouth and an inner scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic s.).

C. In light of the Plaintiff’s situation, the Defendant: (a) performed a treatment plan with the aim of stabilizing the unity by relocating the infants transferred to the Plaintiff due to the loss of dental care at its original location; and (b) decided that the correction of the lost baby alone is difficult to reach the goal of treatment; and (c) recommended the Plaintiff to undergo a comprehensive corrective treatment.

Accordingly, from June 2007 to August 23, 2013, the Plaintiff received correction treatment from the Defendant’s Council member on several occasions.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 1 to Eul evidence 3-2, video and the purport of whole pleadings

2. The summary of the plaintiff's assertion is that the defendant will take the lead of the plaintiff's negligence in the treatment of this case.

arrow