The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below sentenced to the defendant (a year and two months of imprisonment, confiscation and collection) is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are favorable circumstances such as the Defendant’s confessions and reflects all of the instant crimes, the Defendant has been punished six times (five times of imprisonment, five times of suspended execution) for the same crime, the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes during the period of repeated crime without being aware of imprisonment (ten months of imprisonment) after being sentenced to imprisonment for the same crime, and having been released, and without being aware of it, during the period of repeated crime. The Defendant committed each of the instant crimes, and the scope of the recommended sentences of the Supreme Court sentencing guidelines for each of the instant crimes [basic crime and concurrent crimes: the scope of recommended sentences 3 (b), such as administration, simple possession, etc., of the drug crime group - each of the aggravated factors - the previous and several aggravated areas of imprisonment with prison labor for one year to 4 years (three years and three years), and four years (three years and three), and the quantity of phiphonephonephones handled by the Defendant, other age, character and conduct, the Defendant’s environment, the means and methods of the instant crime, and the motive for the Defendant’s punishment.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.